Stories ship but tests lag
The automation backlog grows faster than sprint commitments close.
For agile teams
Turn acceptance journeys into maintainable browser checks, run them against trunk, and bring current evidence into standup, review, and release decisions.
You deliver incrementally and need automation that doesn't fall behind every refinement.
The automation backlog grows faster than sprint commitments close.
CSS or layout changes cascade into hours of locator debugging.
The team stops trusting pipelines that mix noise with real defects.
Developers lack cycles to babysit scripting frameworks mid-sprint.
Align automation with what you actually ship-not a quarterly hardening push.
Cover the feature that just merged before review or demo day.
Catch regressions from daily merges before the next standup.
Verify the journeys you'll walk through in sprint review.
Test flows that span multiple teams' work in one readable suite.
Yes. Teams can record acceptance journeys, update them visually as the story changes, and include the resulting cases in scheduled smoke or regression plans.
Yes. Scheduled plans can execute a selected suite on a recurring cadence so results are available when the team starts its review.
No. QA can refine recorded cases in the QAlity workspace without a test-code branch and review cycle.
The run record identifies the failed step and includes logs and screenshots that help the squad narrow the product or test issue.
Yes. Teams can organize execution around the environment intended for trunk, staging, or release validation.
Record today's shipped feature in QAlity and schedule an overnight cloud run-see the result before standup.